Pluto should be reclassified as a planet, experts suggest

In a new study by the UCF planetary scientist Philip Metzger suggests that this standard for classifying planets is not supported in the research literature.

Pluto should be reclassified as a planet, experts suggest


Should Pluto be reclassified a planet again? UCF scientist Philip Metzger says yes based on his research. Credit: NAS
Is Pluto a planet?
In 2006, the International Astronomical Union(IAU) proposed a definition of a planet that left out Pluto, causing it to lose status and relegate it as a dwarf planet. Since Neptune’s gravity impacts its neighboring planet Pluto, and Pluto imparts its circle to solidified gases and protests in the Kuiper belt, that implied Pluto was out of planet status.
In a new study by the UCF planetary scientist Philip Metzger suggests that this standard for classifying planets is not supported in the research literature.
Metzger says there is no support in the research literature for requiring a planet to clear its orbit. The scientist reviewed the publications made in the last 200 years and found that only one, from 1802, used this requirement to classify a planet. In addition, this single publication was based on a reasoning that has since been refuted.
He said, “moons such as Saturn’s Titan and Jupiter’s Europa have been routinely called planets by planetary scientists since the time of Galileo.”
“The IAU definition would say that the fundamental object of planetary science, the planet, is supposed to be a defined on the basis of a concept that nobody uses in their research. And it would leave out the second-most complex, an interesting planet in our solar system.”
“We now have a list of well over 100 recent examples of planetary scientists using the word planet in a way that violates the IAU definition, but they are doing it because it’s functionally useful. It’s a sloppy definition. They didn’t say what they meant by clearing their orbit. If you take that literally, then there are no planets, because no planet clears its orbit.”
“The literature review showed that the real division between planets and other celestial bodies, such as asteroids, occurred in the early 1950s when Gerard Kuiper published a paper that made the distinction based on how they were formed.”
“However, even this reason is no longer considered a factor that determines if a celestial body is a planet.”
“The IAU’s definition was erroneous since the literature review showed that clearing orbit is not a standard that is used for distinguishing asteroids from planets, as the IAU claimed when crafting the 2006 definition of planets'" said Study co-author Kirby Runyon, with Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Maryland.
Metzger said, “We showed that this is a false historical claim. It is therefore fallacious to apply the same reasoning to Pluto. The definition of a planet should be based on its intrinsic properties, rather than ones that can change, such as the dynamics of a planet’s orbit. Dynamics are not constant, they are constantly changing. So, they are not the fundamental description of a body, they are just the occupation of a body at a current era.”
Metzger said, “And that’s not just an arbitrary definition. It turns out this is an important milestone in the evolution of a planetary body, because apparently when it happens, it initiates active geology in the body.”
“Pluto, for instance, has an underground ocean, a multilayer atmosphere, organic compounds, evidence of ancient lakes and multiple moons. It’s more dynamic and alive than Mars. The only planet that has more complex geology is the Earth.”
The study is published in the journal Icarus.

Subscribe Newsletter

Name

Health,34,Nature,5,Science,73,Space,56,Technology,93,
ltr
item
Scien-Tech News: Pluto should be reclassified as a planet, experts suggest
Pluto should be reclassified as a planet, experts suggest
In a new study by the UCF planetary scientist Philip Metzger suggests that this standard for classifying planets is not supported in the research literature.
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Eb_Oq1kJiAg/W5pwxLjU8YI/AAAAAAAAAh0/cxEv_kQFBWw6vm4lpChWXYtutwk8iiH_wCLcBGAs/s400/pluto.jpg
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Eb_Oq1kJiAg/W5pwxLjU8YI/AAAAAAAAAh0/cxEv_kQFBWw6vm4lpChWXYtutwk8iiH_wCLcBGAs/s72-c/pluto.jpg
Scien-Tech News
https://www.scien-technews.com/2018/09/pluto-should-reclassified-as-planet-expert-suggest.html
https://www.scien-technews.com/
https://www.scien-technews.com/
https://www.scien-technews.com/2018/09/pluto-should-reclassified-as-planet-expert-suggest.html
true
8514685892313606732
UTF-8
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS PREMIUM CONTENT IS LOCKED STEP 1: Share. STEP 2: Click the link you shared to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy